My initial reaction to Acts IV and V is “Wow, that was a lot of action”! These two scenes are the most action packed of the entire play. The only character that reminds me of anyone in my life would be Horatio, as a true friend to Hamlet. Horatio continues to be a solid, stable character with no real flaws revealed like the other characters in the story. These two acts kind of remind me of a soap opera. With all of the action going on simultaneously and the plotting behind closed doors.
Laertes is a supporting character that is marked with an emotionally driven purpose of revenge in Acts IV and V. He is focused on one thing, which is to avenge his father’s death and his sister’s madness. I find it interesting that Laertes has taken on the same life purpose as Hamlet. They are both now living to seek revenge for the death of their fathers. It’s ironic that up until these last two acts we have seen Hamlet expressing despair and hopelessness with thoughts of suicide. Now, he is keenly intent on carrying out his plan for revenge, which is also true of Laertes. Laertes never waivers in his intent which does mark a difference between he and Hamlet and also shows us that Laertes is the stronger character. We see that he is not going to allow anyone, not even the King to misguide him from his purpose. For example in Act IV, Scene VII, Laertes tells Claudius “So you will not o’errule me to a peace”. He made it known to the King that he wanted to carry out his plans for revenge no matter what and the King should not try to change his mind and make him come to peaceful terms with Hamlet.
I never realized the relationship between Hamlet and Laertes until now. It does seem very ironic that both would be experiencing the same situation, and yet would be enemies. I found it interesting that Hamlet seems to become what he is set out to kill. He kills Polonius just like how Claudius killed his father. It seems to be a revolving circle of events all centered on revenge and murder. I wonder if this is Shakespeare's way of portraying a deeper theme to us.
ReplyDeleteThe difference between Laertes and Hamlet is indeed a distinct one. Laertes is very quick to react and does not waiver in his decision to take revenge. Hamlet is much more slow and thoughtful about his actions. You mentioned that their differences prove Laertes to be the stronger character. While this may be true, it is also quite possible that the quick actions of Laertes prove him to be the more foolish and immature of the two.
ReplyDeleteLadawn M,
ReplyDeleteI always love reading your blog and comments as they are always so thought provoking, I always leave with a better understanding of the material. I agree that in these two final acts there is again the theme of life and death. There is so much gruesome talk of death. Claudius so casually orders the death of his stepson and in a blink of an eye is pretending to be so concerned for his welfare. When he realizes that did not work he uses Laertes grief to plot to kill Hamlet by Laertes hand in a duel. Yet, also Hamlet so casually orders the death of his old friends Rosencrantz and Guildenstern which I found so callus. They may have spied on him yet at one time they were friends. I found that interesting.
-Taryne