I could not help but feel sorry for the baby as I read this story. I felt anger and disgust for the couple. Neither one of them had enough common sense or self control to recognize that they were both hurting the baby. Carver uses symbolism with the couple's struggle over the baby. This was a physical struggle over a baby and the baby was physically suffering. This is representative of relationships overall where there are children involved and the couple decides to part ways. The children are the ones who suffer the most. I also see symbolism when Carver uses the line “But it was getting dark on the inside too”. By “dark” I believe he was talking not just about the level of brightness but also referring to the brewing conflict.
Although we don’t get many details of the setting, we can tell by Carver’s style that this was a small house. He uses the word “little” in two different sentences when describing aspects of the house. In the second sentence of the first paragraph he says, “Streaks of it ran down from the little shoulder-high window that faced the backyard”. A few paragraphs from there we see “She stood in the doorway of the “little” kitchen, holding the baby". The fact that there is a backyard tells us it’s a house and by utilizing the word "little" multiple times we can tell that it was small. Also, when he describes the scene in the kitchen by the stove we get a sense of a small cramped space. The stove must have been pretty small because the man was able to reach across the stove into the corner where the woman was and grab the baby.
The irony of the story is revealed at the end. When Carver writes, “She would have it, this baby”, we get a sense that the woman will win the struggle. However, the man makes the final pull and then Carver writes “In this manner, the issue was decided”. I wonder if this final statement has a double meaning. I kind of think it means the “issue” is more than just who gets the baby but I dare not read more into the story than is actually there.